Sarah O'Connor

Sarah O'Connor
FIRM:
O’Connor Richardson Professional Corporation
POSITION:
Principal
AREAS OF PRACTICE:
Civil Litigation, Commercial Litigation, Corporate
PHONE:

Toronto litigator Sarah O’Connor, principal with O’Connor Richardson Professional Corporation, specializes in corporate/commercial and civil litigation.

She earned a Bachelor of Arts (Hons) in history and geography from Queen’s University in 2001 before graduating with a Bachelor of Laws from Osgoode Hall Law School in 2004. She was called to the bar in 2005.

Ms. O’Connor studied international tax and corporate commercial law as an exchange student at the University of West Indies in 2003. In 2013 and 2014, she earned Post Graduate Certificates of Laws in International Business Law from the University of London.

In 2014, Ms. O’Connor earned a Master of Laws in International Business Law from the University of London.

Ms. O’Connor has volunteered as duty counsel with LawHelp Ontario since 2009. She also sits on the board of directors and volunteers as Test Chair with the Central Toronto Skating Club. She is vice-president of Phi Delta Phi, International Legal Fraternity.

Ms. O’Connor is a member of the Ontario Trial Lawyers Association where she acts as a roster lawyer with its Trial Lawyers for Veterans program to help injured veterans who have been denied benefits.

She’s held various roles with Business Network International (BNI) to advise new members of BNI Bay Street procedures and policies. She has acted as mentor, vice-president and education co-ordinator.

Ms. O'Connor represents individuals, small- and medium-sized corporations in litigation before the Superior Court of Ontario, Ontario Court of Appeal and the Federal Court of Canada, as well in various administrative tribunals.

She also handles state accountability, trademark and sexual disease litigation, landlord/tenant disputes, cases against public officers and claims against the provincial and federal governments.

Sarah O'Connor Posts

Ruling unlikely to sway police away from carding

Toronto civil litigator Sarah O’Connor says that a recent ruling involving “carding” is unlikely to sway new Chief of Police Mark Saunders away from his decision to continue the controversial police practice. Read more

B.C. man wrongly imprisoned for 27 years can sue, Supreme Court says

OTTAWA — The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled a B.C. man can use the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to pursue a lawsuit after being wrongly imprisoned for 27 years for sexual assaults he did not commit. The landmark ruling clarifies the circumstances under which criminal prosecutors may be sued if they fail to disclose evidence to accused persons. In 1983, Ivan Henry was convicted of three counts of rape, two counts of attempted rape and five counts of indecent assault in attacks on eight women in Vancouver and declared a dangerous offender. In 2010, the B.C. Court of Appeal overturned Henry's convictions, citing a lack of full disclosure of evidence by prosecutors. It heard that evidence, which came to light during a 2002 police investigation which involved another offender who was implicated in 29 cases and lived near Henry. In 2001, Henry sued the provincial and federal attorneys general, the City of Vancouver and three members of its police department for withholding evidence that could have helped his defence. The case centres on a fine point of charter law, but one which has major ramifications for how criminal cases proceed every day in courtrooms across Canada. Henry wanted to proceed with his lawsuit without having to prove that the Crown's failure to disclose involved malice. The attorneys general wanted the higher standard of malice to be upheld to protect prosecutors from a flood of lawsuits. Justice Michael Moldaver said malice did not need to be proven, but he laid out criteria to govern how the legal test ought to be applied. "This represents a high threshold for a successful charter damages claim, albeit one that is lower than malice,'' he wrote. Toronto civil litigator Sarah O’Connor tells AdvocateDaily.com that the top court's ruling in Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) further elaborates the malice standard in the SCC's malicious prosecution trilogy — Nelles v. Ontario , R. v. Proulx , and Miazga v. Kvello Estate. Read more

State accountability not just a U.S. problem

Toronto civil litigator Sarah O’Connor says citizen journalism and cellphone videos have created more awareness around the issue of state accountability and highlights that police and enforcement officer misconduct is not just an American problem. Read more

International LLM provides a more global view of law

Toronto litigator Sarah O’Connor has convocated from Queen Mary University of London with a Master of Laws in international business. Read more