Decision is a wake-up call for fiduciaries: Ticker
Estate trustees can’t always assume they will be protected from litigation costs following a recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal, Toronto-area estates litigator and mediator Charles Ticker writes in The Lawyers Weekly.
Referencing Brown v. Rigsby 2016 ONCA 521, Ticker writes that in a departure from the norm, the court denied estate trustees indemnification of their legal costs.
He says the appellate court panel found that the two trustees who appealed the initial court ruling dividing costs among the parties had been “unreasonable” and acted in their own “self interest.”
“It’s a wake-up call for estate trustees and other fiduciaries,” writes Ticker, principal of Charles B. Ticker Law Office. “As a general rule, estate trustees involved in litigation over the estate are entitled to be indemnified for reasonably incurred legal costs. However, the Court of Appeal ruled that indemnification is not only conditional on the legal costs incurred being reasonable, but as well, the reasonableness of the conduct of the estate trustee seeking indemnification.”
And that’s where the court found the trustees failed the test, he says.
The case involved a family dispute over an estate with two children who acted as trustees pitted against three of their siblings.
The trio sought to remove their siblings as trustees and they wanted an accounting of how the estate had been disbursed, any misappropriated funds restored, and punitive damages if appropriate.
The action was settled before getting to court in 2014, Ticker writes and the parties agreed the question of costs would be determined by the court.
As Ticker details in the piece, they argued their motion before Justice Lynne Leitch on March 30, 2015. Each side sought an order that the other side pay the costs which totalled nearly $150,000.
“No one interestingly, requested that the estate be ordered to pay costs,” writes Ticker.
While Leitch found the initial premise to secure a passing of the accounts was reasonable, she also noted the trustees were evasive and made untrue statements in their affidavits.
“The judge concluded that the settlement in dispute between the parties reflected divided success and that the appropriate order was that each party be responsible for their own costs,” Ticker writes. “The estate trustees /attorneys sought leave to appeal which was granted. The Court of Appeal observed that generally estate trustees are entitled to be indemnified for all reasonably incurred costs in the administration of an estate.”
Normally, Ticker explains, “This includes the legal costs of an action reasonably defended, to the extent these costs are not recovered from another person. However, a court may order otherwise if an estate trustee has acted unreasonably or in substance for his or her own benefit rather than for the benefit of the estate.”
The court noted that this includes the legal costs of an action reasonably defended, to the extent these costs are not recovered from another person, he says.
However, he adds, a court may order otherwise if an estate trustee has acted unreasonably or in substance for his or her own benefit rather than for the benefit of the estate.
“In other words, play nice or pay the price.”
- Advancing human rights claims based on global supply chain activities: recent developments in California and Canada
- A little help from our friends (of the court): public interest interventions in Ontario courts
- Canada: Ontario Human Rights Commission releases policy statement on medical documentation and disability-related accommodation requests